Enhanced NBA Treble – Risk-Free Potential Profit
-
Cavaliers, Spurs, OKC all to win was 19/20 now 6/4. Max £40
If you fancy a disturbed night you could make around £17 from this, lay prices 1.38, 1.07, 1.38 respectively, they’re playing at 00:05, 01:35, 02:30 too therefore you can lay off each leg individually.
You have to factor in your lay liability from each leg on top of your initial stake when laying the second and third legs, but even when doing so, you should be able to leave £17/£18 profit if the treble lands and £0 risk.
+0January 6, 2016 at 8:44 pm
-
-
New to matched betting?
My Matched Betting Academy is the best place to get started. Learning the fundamentals takes 10-15 minutes and you’ll make £15 in the process.
Learning the fundamentals takes 10-15 minutes and you’ll make £15 in the process.
Who with – I can’t see any of them losing so might just put the bet on.
+0
Hills
Thanks Dash – going to write out the sequential lays and see if your maths is right (sure it is!)
edit – How long does a basketball game last? There is less than an hour between the last 2 times you have quoted Dash – would we therefore be laying the 3rd game before the 2nd had finished? A no-no when sequentially laying I thought?
+0If the Clippers and Spurs are playing each other, about 3 hours! The finish and start times do overlap though.
+0I saw this too. Odds seemed good, so put a fiver on it. Won’t lay. Doesn’t matter how long the middle match lasts – looks like there’s only one winner. And by the time the third match starts, the winner should be pretty evident.
…famous last words.
+0Spurs are the best team in the NBA at the moment – beat defense and playing a Jazz side in bad form since Gobert hot injured.
Irving is getting back into form after his injury for the Cavaliers and James has finally found his shooting touch – he had the worst shooting percentage outside 10 feet until a couple of games ago in the NBA!
OKC may be without Durant – with Westbrook only, they are a .5 team, but that should be enough against the Grizzlies, who are poor this year.
As Pavlon says, I’d lay the first and last game … but I’ll be in bed so a straight bet for me,
+0Am I correct in thinking that if we can lay all these for zero/£17 return, this is definitely plus eV, and in the long run I can just poke a small proportion of my bank roll on bets like this without laying and expect eventually to be up?
+0This is generally what I do, but try to keep these bets to a fiver. WillHill do quite a few decent enhanced bets.
+0Well it’s a tenner on! Less than 1% of my bankroll though. Good luck!
+0
It sure is. The odds for the treble should be around evens (2.00). The enhanced odds of 2.5 give an expected return of +25% – or if you bet the £40, it would be +£10.
+0
Nah …fuck it, I’d rather get a good sleep!
+0
Ok, well I’m gonna stick a tenner on it and not bother laying – the above +EV arguments seem sound enough to me! 😀
+0
Nice one on the alert to this Dash. Managed to get 90 on it across 3 accounts and underlaid for 39 potential profit.
Also have the lay already done on Betfair so when the alarm wakes me I just need to wake, check result and either cancel the other lays if a selection lost or go back to sleep if it won.
+0I threw a £10 bet on and went to bed – RESULT another £15 in profit 🙂
+0
Well, that was a pleasant surprise this morning… I love waking up to overnight profit! Threw £20 on it in the end as I never bet less than that on Hills, so +£30 is a lovely way to start the day!
Cheers to Dash for posting and others for their NBA knowledge which convinced me it was a logical if not entirely safe punt 😀
+0
Can’t you all see how profitable it is to bet the max on these enhanced offers and letting them run (not laying)? If you had done so yesterday (nba treble, lukaku anytime, city to score next, barca+btts) you would have been up a couple of hundred for your trouble. Of course most days won’t be as lucky, but so long as you compare each enhancement to exchange odds to ensure its good value, it’s profitable in the long run and you don’t get scalped with commission.
+0
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
