Is 80% too high?

  • I am finding it harder and harder to find matches that give me an 80% so I am beginning to wonder if we are now expecting too much when we calculate the return of a free bet to be 80%. I use OddsMonkey but regularly when I look for a bet with an SNR above 80% for a particular bookie I get 0 results. The exception seems to be if you want to back horses at 20/1 or more (which I tend to ignore as I think too many of these is probably not a good thing).

    Do other people find similar results?

  • New to matched betting?

    My Matched Betting Academy is the best place to get started. Learning the fundamentals takes 10-15 minutes and you’ll make £15 in the process.

    Learning the fundamentals takes 10-15 minutes and you’ll make £15 in the process.

    Wisermiser 13

    Hi Kevin, I can usually find an 80% match on horses, particularly early on in the day when the bookies are still asleep. If not then I often switch sports e.g football matches, tonight Bournemouth are 11/12.5 or on Saturday West Brom are 9/10 (365/bf) Again too many of these may not be advisable but now and then I will overlay matches of around 70-75% to get them up to the 80% mark. Cheers

    +1
    scabbadab 252

    I do mostly horse racing doubles for my freebets- If I have a £20 free bet Ill find 2 different horses around say 5-1 shots- both laying at time at around 6.2 (normally easy enough) then ill lay off about £16 on the 1st one at 6.2 (can even get BOG with some firms these days on muliples) If the 1st wins Ive extracted around £16 either way -80%- (without possible BOG boost) Then Ill be looking to lay the £83 or so off on the next 6.2 (which you could lay for more than £83 making your £16 extraction improve) because if the 2nd 5/1 wins (with no BOG) Then you will be kopping £620 -£20 FB stake =£600 form bookie and only paying out £430 ( +£83 already lost on 1st one) making around -£513 or so lost on the exchange if you accepted the £16 extraction. So roughly 1/6 times when 1st one wins you will be in an improved posistion. All in all I consider a strategy along these lines- higher odds than 5-1s better (as long as they are tight lays at time)- and factoring possible BOG and extra profit on 2nd lay on double if the 1st one comes in- I believe makes a £20 free bet worth between £17-18- at least 80% and pushing towards 90% in my book.

    +0
    Kevin M 3

    Thanks both. @scabbadab – I will certainly look into your doubles idea and check out the maths behind it.

    +0
    scabbadab 252

    Cool Kevin. For me it improves the chances of finding very high odds with close match ups. So the 2 5/1 shots is in effect a 35/1 shot on the double coming in – with normally not to hard to find close match ups. Of cousre the ‘risk’ is the 2nd horse may drift by the time you come to lay off if the 1st one has won (just as likely though to have come in in price) Ideally you find a huge each way price that is a tight match up or actually an each way arb- Say a 50/1 shot that is laying bang on each way or better and do £10 e/way with the FB. Obviously the higher the odds you can match closely or even find an ‘arb’ for the closer you will get to maximising the value of the free bet. Many a time on a £20 FB i pick up I stick it on a horse upwards of 25/1 that is laying e/w for less or simalar- then just calculate my win/place match ups for at least a total £16+ on the win/place lays to lock in the minimum £16 profit and leave room for at least that much profit if the horse wins/places.
    Normally much more chance of finding big price tight match ups/arbs on the horses than other sports. Just finding say for e.g a 12-1 horse that is laying for 13.5 is good enough- if I dont want to spend ages trying to find better to squeeze an extra £1-2 out of the £20fb- Lay it for £17.50 at 13.5. If it wins +£21.25 – loses im up £17 (inc the comms) locked in over 85%. Again with BOG you get the outside chance (in the case of a high price horse- of it winning at a higher price than the original back and layed price) which always adds at least a little bit of extra long term gain.
    80% would be minimum return I would expect- and normally when I accumulate a £20 fb I think of its average value of about £17 (85%) I accumulate a lot of em and dont always wish to spend too long looking for ‘perfect’ match ups but would never settle for expected value on them being less than 80% (£16)

    +0
    scabbadab 252

    I forgot to mention- another reason I do well matched up (at time of bet) Horse racing doubles with FBs is the risk of NRs- nothing worse than doing a well matched Horse race single bet with your FB only to see it go as a NR and wipe out your FB (No money back on FB nrs/non starters) So the doubles/trebles make the chance of a FB wipeout highly unlikely

    +0
    Kevin M 3

    Thanks Scabbadab.

    I will definitely give this a go on my next FBs. Just one last question – how often do you get £20 FBs ! Apart from the Bet365 (which I haven’t yet managed to get a winner on) FBs tend to be £5 for me.

    +0
    scabbadab 252

    A lot Kevin! I sharb most days in shops (PP/Boyles and Ladbrokes) In ireland have daily Horse Racing offers with up to 20 euro free bet if 2nd to fav/2nd to a bigger price winner etc(some days not the best some days/races pretty good) So I accumalate on average at least a few (sometimes double figures) each day I go out ‘in the field’ Sometimes Im lazy with them and they give me a headache using up time trying to find best value match ups but I try my best most times- and have come to the conclusion that good horse racing match ups on multiples or on a value/e/way arbing big price shot thats close to starting (minimising the nr factor) are the way to go for me. It would be an under statement to say Ive gone through 1000s+ of £20 euro fbs in the last few years!

    +0
    scabbadab 252

    The Hosre racing TV offers on Bet 365 are very nice- Back a 4/1+ winner get up to £50 fb if it wins on next TV race. They are well worth getting to stuck into and finding close match ups on them- but try and stick the odd bet on a non offer race that is fairly tight to mix it up a bit help keep off the gubbing radar a bit. Worth losing the odd £1 or £2 to keep up punter appearences

    +0
    Wisermiser 13

    Cheers Scabba, I followed your ‘fb doubles’ tip for the first time today with a free £5 on Apollo One/Ice Station Zebra with skybet at Salisbury and just copped £220. I’d laid about £190 in total and a bit of a drift on the 2nd race got me an extra £12 so overall, happy days 👍

    +0
    scabbadab 252

    Very nice Wiser! With most firms now paying out BOG on muliples the doubles or more on the horses FB method is even better now- Plus as i mentioned with at least a double you reduce the risk of a NR wiping out your FB (No refunds on FB nrs sadly) So unless you find a big each way arb jumps horse close to off time- I would never advise sticking your FB on a Horse single- I did recently have my 1st ever- prob from over 500!- FB double where both selections ended up NRs and that was the 1st time I donated an FB this way. If I have time now I often try and find a closely matched treble! But as the old saying goes Doubles For Dough- Trebles for show! – This quote dosnt have any relavance- but I like the old classic phrase- so dropped it in!

    +0
    Kevin M 3

    I’ve tried the above suggestion and while I still think it’s the right thing to do I am a bit confused over the amount to lay.

    I think I understand the first lay correctly as being the amount to retain from the FB. So in the case of your example I would lay £16. If Leg 1 loses I get £16.

    It’s the second leg I run into trouble with. I think the £83 you refer to is the amount loss at the exchange on the first leg. But if I lay this amount don’t I end up as breaking even if leg 2 loses? -83 from leg 1 and +83 from leg 2.

    If so, does that mean I lay the £83 + £16 I want to retain = £99 ?

    This gives me the right amount if leg 2 loses but now I appear to be only winning £2 if leg 2 wins.

    Bookmaker Exchange Loss on Leg 1 Total
    Leg 2 wins 600.00 -514.80 -83.20 2.00
    Leg 2 loses 0 99.00 -83.20 15.80

    Can you tell me where I have gone wrong please.

    +0
    scabbadab 252

    If the 1st leg has won- meaning in this example you have now lost £83 on the exchange- Your bet now has £120 going on on a 5/1- If the 2nd bet wins the bookies will pay you £720 – the £20 fb stakes =$700 (+£683 if a £20 fb is worth £17) So you can lay way more than the original loss on exchange of £83 + the expected value of FB £17 =£100 on the 2nd leg of the double. You could lay off about £110 on the 2nd leg for e.g (if still laying at same price say 6.2) If that loses your now up £27 in total (minus about £2 in commision- net +£25) If it wins you have lost £572 + £83 from 1st bet (total -£655) But you are up £700 with the bookie. So in this case either +£25 or if double wins + £45. Can play around with the stakes on 2nd leg as you see fit.

    What you may be missing is the FB stake dosnt come off the 1st leg of the muliple- it comes off when the double (or more runners trebles etc) has been completed. At least it does in Ladbrokes/Boyles/PPs- so I assume all major firms do the same. For eg yesterday a £10 fb treble I did on a 3/1-4/5-11/8 paid about £165- so the treble was paid in full then the £10 fb was deducted to give the £165 total.

    So by my reckoning on this example of the 2 5/1 shots. 1/6 occasions when the 1st leg wins you will be in an improved position of at least £8 more than the single bet 5/1 6.2 lay off of +£17. Adding about £1.60 to the long term original single 5/1 value. Im not one for breaking down exact pennies but hopefully you get my overall take on it.

    +0
    scabbadab 252

    If it all sounds a bit complex- or risky as things like prices on additional legs of the multiple horse bet may go the wrong way. Then just find yourself a 10-1+ Horse (or sports bet) that is laying close say at 11.5. Stick a (for e.g) £20 fb on the 10/1 horse with bookie- £200 back if it wins- Lay £17.42 at 11.5 and Lose £182.90 for the win. So + £17.10 if it wins or + £17.42 (- about 55p commision) so +£16.87 if dosnt win. And there you have an 85% simple enough return- With the odd rare BOG boost (pretty rare for big price drifters to win) if horse wins at drifting/bigger price
    As I deal nearly always day to day in Horse markets- I find them easier to catch close decent sized prices/matches than most other sports- the reason I go for multiples is not only do I think they add to long term value but they greatly reduce the NR factor (You wont get a FB refund on a NR- Or 2+ for that matter!)

    I will certainly leave it there- Good hunting/Luck

    +0
    Wisermiser 13

    Hi Scabba, re our earlier posts, I’ve persisted with the FB doubles’ and won another with Boyles today. I backed ‘accordingtogino’ @ 8 in the 14.10 and ‘defutureisbright’ @ 2.88 in the 14.45 (Warwick) first thing this morning and both won. Only problem is that as ‘defutureisbright’ went off at 3.75, I assumed bog and adjusted my lay accordingly but its only been paid out at 2.88 leaving me out of pocket 😠. Boyles promotion page announces ‘bog on multiples online and instore’ so just thought I’d check if anyone has had a similar experience and whether you think it’s worth contacting customer services ? Cheers

    +0
    Wisermiser 13

    Doh, re the above, I’ve just found the full terms and conditions of Boyles bog on multiples’ offer and it excludes free bets !!🤬 Oh well, lesson learned !

    +0
Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.