Why do Exchanges charge commission?

  • This may have been asked & answered elsewhere, but I couldn’t find a post.

    Why do betting exchanges think it’s OK to charge commission on winnings, when the split between back and lay odds already looks to guarantee them a margin?

    If you look at the live odds for any event, the current back odds will always be a point or two lower than the lay odds. Is there a reason for this that I haven’t understood, other than the exchange creaming off a small profit on every stake?

  • New to matched betting?

    My Matched Betting Academy is the best place to get started. Learning the fundamentals takes 10-15 minutes and you’ll make £15 in the process.

    Learning the fundamentals takes 10-15 minutes and you’ll make £15 in the process.

    Matt
    Keymaster
    1490

    Betting exchanges are peer-to-peer betting platforms, Neil. It’s not the exchange that keeps your stake or pays you your winnings; it’s someone else betting on the platform.

    The commission charged on winnings is simply their reward for providing us with a platform on which we can bet against other people.

    I hope that helps.

    +0
    Neil S 76

    Thanks Matt – that much makes sense. But what I’m still curious about is why the lay odds are always higher than the back odds.

    Surely, if I want to back a horse on the exchange at odds of, say, 3.0 then I should be able to lay the bet at 3.0 too, because that’s just effectively another punter backing at those odds?

    Is it even technically possible for the lay odds to be lower?

    +1
Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.