WH Acca Insurance: Example

  • Hi all, there’s been plenty of discussion and scepticism of the ACCA insurance offers being profitable. I have decided to share an ACCA with Will Hill that I am placing today. If you’re not familiar with the T&Cs, please read them, but we are looking for 6 football legs and there is no odds requirement. If one leg loses, we get our stake back as a free bet. Finally, this month they are offering a 10% bonus on odds for 6 leg ACCAs… The first odds are from WH, and the second odds are on the exchange.

    1. New Saints (Welsh) at 1.25 / 1.25
    2. Arsenal at 1.30 / 1.30
    3. Dunfermline at 1.22 / 1.23
    4. Juventus at 1.17 / 1.18
    5. Barcelona at 1.22 / 1.23
    6. Atletico Madrid at 1.20 / 1.21

    Using the exchange odds to calculate implied probabilities, we see that the probability that our ACCA wins is:
    Pr(Wins) = 0.2849

    The probability that exactly one leg loses and we get our stake back:
    Pr(One loses) = 0.3988

    And, of course, the probability that more than one leg loses:
    Pr(Loses) = 0.3163

    The maximum stake is £50 for the insurance. Our value of staking £50 is therefore (the 1.10 factor accounts for a 10% bonus; the 0.90 factor accounts for extraction rate which could be decreased if you like):

    Value of £50 bet = 0.2849*3.396*1.10*50 + 0.3988*0.90*50 + 0.3163*0 = £71.16

    In other words, we are paying £50 for £71.16 in expected value! Our expected profit is therefore £21.16. My approach is to never lay these as we lose out to commission in the long-run and I place frequently enough to even out (law of large numbers etc. etc.).

    If you want to lay off an accumulator, like the one given above, you will need to ensure that none of the legs overlap – this allows you to treat each leg as an individual qualifying bet which you can continually lay off until one legs loses and you then have a free shot at a free bet.

    I hope this helps!

  • New to matched betting?

    My Matched Betting Academy is the best place to get started. Learning the fundamentals takes 10-15 minutes and you’ll make £15 in the process.

    Learning the fundamentals takes 10-15 minutes and you’ll make £15 in the process.

    vibez 0

    Mark, how do you calculate the odds of just one leg losing?

    +0
    mincing_lad 0

    Work out the odds that bet 1 loses and the others win. Then work out the odds that bet 2 loses and the others win. And so on. Then add them all together.

    +0
    sypunterguy 0

    Hi guys and thanks for the help already given, I’m in Australia so bookies etc will vary. After finally wrapping my head around these I’ve done a spreadsheet to calculated EV. I don’t think I can attach it so I’ll summarise here.

    There are four bookies out here doing money back on a 4 leg accumulator. One allowed each weekend, at $50. (about 25pounds). Some have min odds of 1.10 (only affected Real Madrid at 1.07), some on one league only some on any mix.

    My odds varied from 1.17 to 1.61 across the four bets. I’m not laying so have gone for heavy favourites only.

    The four accumulators pay from 2.6 to 4.3 All four winners vary from 23% to 38%, bizarrely 3 wins probability only varies from 41.9% to 42.8% across the four bets. Obviously then less than 3 wins is 19% to 35% or the remainder.

    According to my calculations all four accumulators give an expected value of from $68.28 to $69.24; or a profit of $18-19 or 37%.

    Is it usual to see this much consistency? It appears to be an easy addition of $75 a week, or am i missing something?

    If anyone wants the spreadsheet happy to email it.

    +0
    vibez 0
    +0
    mike j 13

    Just to let you guys know, rather than laying each bet i have been betting on double chance result at another bookie. Currently on leg 3/6 and have saved £11 doing it this way thus increasing profit if i make it to the final game

    +0
    MarkCorrigan 15

    How is betting double chance not the same as laying?

    +0
    mike j 13

    Normally you would lay each game off at an exchange.Each lay bet would cover the original acca stake plus the liability you lost on previous lay bets.

    I have been finding better odds on the double chance market as opposed to the lay market. E.g

    Leg 3: lay 58.31 @ 1.40 = 23.32 liability

    Or bet 20 @ 3.0 double chance

    If the lay bet looses you would lose 20 instead of 23.32. If the lay bet would have won then you would make 60 instead of 57.14 (2% comission)

    So whatever the outcome you are better off.

    +0
    78naD 4

    It is the same as laying but if you have 30-40 accounts you’ll often find much better odds than laying on an exchange

    +0
    Andy 3

    mike – betting 20 @ 3.0 is £40 profit not £60.

    +0
    MarkCorrigan 15

    I understand what you’re saying, but conceptually laying and double chance are equivalent. Of course, it’s always possible to look for the best possible odds.

    In your example, btw, laying at 1.4 is far superior to backing the opposite at 3.0. In a competitive market, 1.5 is the opposite to 3.0.

    +1
    mincing_lad 0

    Spypunter, can you mail me the EXCEL. Which bookies are you using in Aus?

    +0
    mincing_lad 0

    Mark C – Do you have a strategy for withdrawing money? I am assuming you must end up in profit at the the likes of William Hill. Do you just withdraw this or are you then doing bets transfer money to the exchanges to withdraw?

    +0
    sypunterguy 0

    mincing_lad email me pulpdvd at gmail dot com

    +0
    JoeBloggs 0

    Hi Guys,

    Some great tips here, I wanted to see if I have this worked out properly? Are these both mathematically correct to make the Accumulator profitable (both the figures given and the results if I have one loss or no losses:

    Example 1, Laying off each low adds leg until 1 loses the bet, with a £25 free bet:

    Team, Odd, Lay Odds, Lay Stake
    Leg 1, 1.65 1.66, £23.82
    Leg 2, 1.35, 1.36, £39.86
    Leg 3, 1.45, 1.46, £54.50
    Leg 4, 1.60, 1.61, £80.09
    Leg 5, 1.07, 1.08, £129.94
    Leg 6, 1.22, 1.23, £140.54

    Possible Outcomes:

    1) Should I not have a losing leg to the bet I have lost -£1.18
    2) Should I have 1 losing leg to the bet, I get the £25 free bet and that is where I make the profit (around 80% of the £25)

    Example 2, Engineering the Accumulator where Leg 1 being high odds (Laid off) and the others left to run (Not laid off):

    Team, Odd, Lay Odds, Lay Stake
    Leg 1, 5.00, 5.60, £41.21 (The lay stake is what I would normally lay, plus 80% of the expected £25 free bet)
    Leg 2, 1.35, 1.36, £120.79
    Leg 3, 1.45, 1.46, £165.16
    Leg 4, 1.60, 1.61, £242.69
    Leg 5, 1.07, 1.08, £393.74
    Leg 6, 1.22, 1.23, £425.89

    Possible Outcomes:
    1) Should the first leg win at the bookies and not the exchange, I have lost -£3.89
    2) Should the bet go to plan, I have my Leg 1 lose and the rest win, I can extract around 80% for my £25 free bet and get £20 profit
    Any advice welcome please… and thanks in advance.

    +0
    topire 1

    Is this offer available in store as well or is it just online, I was thinking of doubling up my bets in store because the offer is so good

    +0
Viewing 15 replies - 106 through 120 (of 130 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.