ACCA (again sorry!)

  • Hi Guys,
    First post in a while!

    Thought it was time I started on the Acca’s. I feel the best method for me personally is the Lay all at the start method, I presume the no lay method is probably more beneficial, however guess i’m just a wimp!

    Result Bookmaker Exchange Your Profit
    All win (24%) £68 -£40 £28
    1 lose (40%) -£5 -£7.50 -£12.50
    2 lose (26%) -£25 £25 £0
    3 lose (9%) -£25 £57.50 £32.50
    4 lose (1%) -£25 £90 £65
    All lose (0.1%) -£25 £122.50 £97.50

    I found the above online, this is based off a £25 stake and back and lay odds of 1.3/1.32. I assume this is correct?

    Any tips would be appreciated!
    Thanks

  • New to matched betting?

    My Matched Betting Academy is the best place to get started. Learning the fundamentals takes 10-15 minutes and you’ll make £15 in the process.

    Learning the fundamentals takes 10-15 minutes and you’ll make £15 in the process.

    Coffeeman 0

    Special One – TBH no I haven’t done many Coral Acca’s and never had a free bet. I dont like using Connect/Grid cards really – I’m off the opinion they can track you to easily.

    I do know what your talking about tho – Barcelona @ 1/16 – right.

    FYI – the 1/9 minimum odds is for the ONLINE offer. The In-Shop offer does not have any minimum odds requirements published either on the coupon, on the in-shop flyer nor online in the “Connect in-Shop Football Acca Insurance” T&C’s. (Coral have in last few days removed the on-line link but I have a picture if your friend needs it).

    I would tell your friend to complain to IBAS & even ASA – Coral dont have a leg to stand on in this case. That said I am bloody sure they will now change their T&C’s to min 1/9 & possibly one free bet per customer.
    HTH

    +0
    Dave_Jones 12

    Just wanted to vouch for everything Foggy has said regarding no lay accas in this and other threads. I didn’t think I would come even close to the kind of returns he has been making doing them, he sounds far more meticulous than I am.

    I only work out my profits every three or four months, and for the last three months I have made just over £4000. Over 95% of this profit has come from no lay accas.

    This has been the easiest £4k I have ever made, the amount of work involved compared to the rewards has been terrific. Unfortunately I have now been restricted at one bookie and I will be amazed if the rest of my accounts last until xmas.

    Once my footie insurance accounts have gone I might look into doing this in the shops, although living in a rural area might make this impractical.

    Want to issue a massive thank you to Foggy and others who have been so helpful in providing information to enable me to achieve these results.

    +0
    FoG_BLoG 61

    Thanks Dave. Glad it worked it for you.

    Thing to remember though is that 99% of the time you will have a story like Dave here but then there is still that 1 person in 100 that try it and lose their entire bank roll.

    And with maybe over 100 ppl reading this forum then chances are that one person reading this thread will lose a wedge.

    Only gamble what you can afford to lose.

    So what I did was I funded my sportingbet account with £300 (from matched betting profit, not from next months rent money). Whenever it went over I would withdraw profits and keep 300 balance. If it hit zero then I would deposit £100 again made from matched betting. That way I never risked “real” money.

    Some ppl can’t afford to lose 300 or 400 or 500 before winning 600. If that’s you then stay away from no lay accas!

    I wonder what your worst losing streak was Dave. I’ve def had weekends where I’ve lost 300-500£. Only the next week to win it all back and more.

    +0
    Dave_Jones 12

    @ Foggy, your absolutely right using the no lay method there is always a chance of losing your entire bank. I had already made a few thousand pounds profit from the more conventional match betting techniques. I was prepared to carry on until I had lost £1k and would re evaluate if that happened (ie. was I doing something wrong, had I completely misunderstood the methodology).

    I think I was fairly lucky, I was in profit right from the first weekend. Although I did have some draw downs, I never came close to going into the red.

    As mentioned in my last post I don’t keep detailed records of each and every bet. Perhaps I should be a bit ashamed to admit it, but I don’t use a spread sheet to record all my bets. All I do is keep accurate records of any money I put in or take out of my bookie and exchange accounts. Then every few months add up the totals and work out my profits.

    Having said that, I have a rough idea of around where I am up to. Regarding my biggest draw down, it would have been in the region of £200. When this happened I was already up over £1k and so was never concerned about it.

    I did a few things to try and minimise variance.

    1. If I had accas with four winning legs, and the fifth taking place on other days (this happened a great deal of the time), then I always laid the last leg off using Matts risk free calculator. The loss in EV is really small, and I think this helped in limiting the draw downs.

    2. I tried to get at least 80% return on each F.B.

    3. I took your advice and didn’t do any accas which provided less than 10% EV return. Most of them tended to be around the 20% level. I did however often give up a little bit of EV in exchange for a higher win rate. Some pros may well laugh at that, and if one could be sure ones accounts would last for years then it would be a mistake.

    The way I looked at it though, was my accounts can be gubbed or restricted at any time, so given that fact, I would be better off giving up some EV and get a better win rate, because I might not have the accounts long enough for the EV to even out.

    I also think the end of the footie season both here and abroad may have helped too. I have not looked at any stats for previous years, but in the last month of the major league footie seasons the favorites seemed to win more often than they normally do. I had some weekends in that last month where almost every acca was either a win, a FB or gave me the chance to lay off the last leg using the risk free calc.

    +0
    Kron 0

    @Dave_Jones How much are you laying on the final leg? A middle ground between the amount you expect to make from 80% free bet retention and the profit from the ACCA?

    +0
    Dave_Jones 12

    @ Kron I just use Matts risk free calculator and when I do the EV calcs there is very little difference between laying and not laying the last leg. You lose a little bit of money (long term) doing it this way, but it helps reduce variance.

    As mentioned previously accounts often don’t tend to last long term so I felt reducing variance was more important than maximising profit.

    +0
    Dave_Jones 12

    @ Kron here is an example which might be clearer than the explanation I have given. Imagine we have a 5 leg acca with all odds (back and lay) of 1.2.

    So all 5 legs are going to win about 40% of the time and we are going to get a FB about 40% of the time.

    If we do the EV calcs on this acca assuming were using a £25 stake and our first four legs have all won then our EV if we do nothing comes out to £30.15.

    If we use Matts risk free calculator and plug the numbers in then we get a guaranteed profit of £30.04 when using a lay stake of £35.76.

    So although we give up a few pence in profit by laying, I think its worth it to get the guaranteed income.

    +0
    Dave_Jones 12

    @ Foggy, I should have listed one more thing in my list to try and reduce variance.

    4. With bookies such as Coral where the overall acca has to come to at least odds of 4. The first four legs would be really low (think its a minimum of 1.11 now) and then the last leg would be high enough to make the over all up to 4. This meant I had a much better chance of having the first four legs win, and so enable me to lay off the fifth using Matts calculator.

    +0
    Eskander 0

    Apologies, newbie question inbound…

    I dabbled with a no lay ACCA at Coral for £5 last night. First 3 games all won, last 2 are on Sunday.

    If the ACCA wins, I net £40.81 (after deducting the £5 stake). Both the remaining games are currently laying at 1.8.

    Am I right in thinking that if I wanted to I could lay the remaining games to lock in a profit? My back of a fag packet calculations suggest the following outcomes for a £4 lay at Betfair on the remaining matches:

    Both win: Bookie + £40.81, Exchange – £6.40 (2 x £3.20 lays), Profit = £34.41

    1 or 2 lose: Exchange + £0.60 (£3.80 from win, -£3.20 from loss), 80% of FB + £4, Profit = £4.60

    1 & 2 lose: Exchange + £7.60 (2 x £3.80), Profit = £7.60

    Cheers,

    Eskander

    +0
    Dave_Jones 12

    I assume the last two games are being played simultaneously or are over lapping. If not then you could lay them sequentially, Matt has recently produced a new calculator that will work out the lay amounts for you. I have not used it as I usually don’t bother laying unless the first four legs have won and there is time to lay off the fifth using Matts risk free calculator.

    For you final outcome you wrote:-
    1 & 2 lose: Exchange + £7.60 (2 x £3.80), Profit = £7.60

    I think you need to deduct your initial stake from this figure so your final profit when the last two legs lose should be £2.60.

    +0
    Dave_Jones 12

    I think you also need to subtract your stake from outcome 2 as well. So if leg 4 or 5 lose then you end up with a loss of 40 pence.

    +0
    Eskander 0

    Thank you for taking the time to reply Dave.

    Thought I might have been missing something, still is nice to know that I was nearly there and the rest of the logic stacks up.

    Yes the two games are simultaneous. I didn’t think about this type of outcome when placing the bet, though now I think I’ll lay the remaining two. Given the calcs, worst outcome when laying is a 40p loss with best case being +£34.41. Without laying worst case is £5 loss with potential return of £40.81. Seems that without laying them I’m essentially risking £5 to gain an extra potential £6.40 which doesn’t seem worthwhile to me!

    Thanks again for your time and sorry again for the newbie questions, just thought it best to check that I wasn’t completely off track before going ahead and doing it!

    Eskander

    +0
    Dave_Jones 12

    No need to apologise Eskander, for someone new to all this I think you have got a good understanding, far better than I did when I first started. Things have gone a bit quite on the boards at the moment due to not much footie around. If you have an interest in football accas I would suggest you read everything FogBlog has wrote on the subject in this and other threads.

    Finally if that’s not enough for you, search out posts written by Mark Corrigan. He was mainly the person that introduced the mathematical approach to accas. Unfortunately he doesn’t post here anymore, but I think he now trades just on BF. He made a post about it some time back, but although I have a decent maths background, what he was doing was way beyond my capabilities.

    +0
    Dave_Jones 12

    As often is the case with these accas laying or not laying makes little difference to your expected value (EV), but laying does help to smooth out the variance. I often make mistakes when doing EV calculations so don’t take the following as gospel. In fact if I was you I would probably do my own EV calculations it will pay off in the long term if you want to make some decent money from accas.

    I think the probability of the last two legs both winning is 30.8%.
    The probability of one of the last two legs losing is 55.5%.
    The probability of the last two legs losing is 13.7%.

    You can use this information to work out what the EV of laying is and I get a figure of £12.42. This figure is very close to the EV value of £12.56 which is the figure I get if you don’t bother laying.

    If you or anyone else spots a mistake please let me know, as mentioned previously I often make errors when doing these calculations.

    +0
    Eskander 0

    Thanks Dave!

    Think you’re maybe over-estimating my understanding of this! Turns out I made a couple of mistakes with it…. Firstly the last 2 games weren’t overlapping, one was at midnight and the other was at 8pm, didn’t realise until after the 4th leg had won though so wasn’t the worst of mistakes! Still, that’s why I started with £5 stakes rather than the full £25. Ended up laying the last match (which typically won) so took a guaranteed profit of about £27. Should have left un-laid in hindsight, but I guess if we had hindsight for all bets then we wouldn’t bother laying anything. Also didn’t occur to me until afterwards that I could have cashed out the acca at Coral directly for possibly more profit than I’d locked in for with the lay!

    Thanks for the resource suggestions as well, will definitely read up on them. Similar to yourself I have quite a mathematical background however I haven’t done anything around probability theory in years.

    I did try doing my own EV calc for the scenario I set out earlier but came out with different numbers (I had probability of 31% both win, 20% both lose, 49% 1 loses). I also had different EVs (Lay £10.94, No Lay £11.11) though as you can see is still consistent with what you were saying in that there isn’t a great deal in it. As mentioned though I haven’t read any of the things you suggested yet so more than likely made a mistake somewhere myself when calculating the probabilities of the outcomes.

    Will definitely read up on those suggestions of yours and do a bit more practicing over the summer ready for next season!

    Once again thanks for your help and taking the time to reply and provide further information and explanations, is much appreciated!

    Eskander

    +0
Viewing 15 replies - 181 through 195 (of 307 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.